<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>East Bay Young Democrats &#187; Amtrak</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ebyd.org/site/tag/amtrak/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ebyd.org/site</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:34:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>California Awarded $2.35 Billion for High Speed Rail!</title>
		<link>http://www.ebyd.org/site/2010/01/california-awarded-2-35-billion-for-high-speed-rail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ebyd.org/site/2010/01/california-awarded-2-35-billion-for-high-speed-rail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 01:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roobs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amtrak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Speed Rail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ebyd.org/site/?p=424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The White House announced yesterday that California would recieve $2.35 billion for for rail related projects.  Specifically, $2.25 billion for high speed rail construction, wich included $400 million reserved for construction of the SF Transbay Terminal Station, and $1 billion for Amtrak corridor improvements including: Capitol...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The White House <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/fact-sheet-high-speed-intercity-passenger-rail-program-california" target="_blank">announced yesterday</a> that California would recieve $2.35 billion for for rail related projects.  Specifically, $2.25 billion for high speed rail construction, wich included $400 million reserved for construction of the SF Transbay Terminal Station, and $1 billion for Amtrak corridor improvements including:</p>
<p>Capitol Corridor-South Terminal Station Improvement<br />
Capitol Corridor-YoloXover (Yolo West Crossover)<br />
Capitol Corridor-Track Relocation<br />
Pacific Surfliner -Railroad Crossover Program<br />
Pacific Surfliner – Oceanside Stub Project 1<br />
Pacific Surfliner Corridor-MOW Spurs<br />
Los Angeles to Fullerton Triple Track<br />
Pacific Surfliner Corridor-PE NEPA Ortega<br />
Pacific Surfliner -Corridor Strategic Assessment<br />
Rolling Stock-Locomotive Emissions Upgrade (including San Joaquins)<br />
Rolling Stock-Cab Car Bicycle Storage</p>
<p>I am a staunch supporter of high speed rail in California, and all over the US for that matter.  I have wanted to see a high speed rail in our state since i was a little kid.  I remember absolutely HATING the fact that my mother, who refused to drive through Tehachapi, would make me and my sister join her in the 5 hour journey to San Bernardino to visit my grandparents (driving in a car vs. public transit is only 4 hours).  The trip was a 1 hour Amtrak train ride from Hanford to Bakersfield, followed by a 4 hour bus ride from Bakersfield to San Bernardino.  I get closterphobic just thinking about it.  This same trip on the proposed CAHSR would take approximately 2 hours from Fresno to Ontario or Riverside stations.</p>
<p>The California High Speed Rail Authority released its <a href="http://www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov/library.asp?p=8200" target="_blank">business plan</a> in December, detailing things like cost projections.  The plan stated it would cost about $42 billion to create the entire system.  Yes, $2.25 isn&#8217;t a lot vis a vis $42 billion, but it definately jumps starts a project and allows the Authority to create a visible and tangible portion of the system to help the hesitators and nay-sayors come over to the greener side.  Keep in mind that $42 billion is less than 1/3 the cost to expand our highways to accomodate the same number of projected future travelers at $150 billion.  Not to mention that whole, environmentally friendly and creating about 450,000 permanent and 500,000 temp jobs in the process and stimulating the economy in a recession, thingy&#8230;</p>
<p>Who&#8217;s excited?  I&#8217;m excited!</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_Nx8rNysZSI&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_Nx8rNysZSI&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></object></p>
<p>I will also give a plug to the grassroots organization working to help bring high speed rail to California: <a href="http://www.ca4hsr.org" target="_blank"><strong>Californian&#8217;s for High Speed Rail</strong></a><strong>.</strong>  They are a new group but i beleive they represent a great opportunity to bring on the ground momentum and make Californians excited about the idea of high speed rail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ebyd.org/site/2010/01/california-awarded-2-35-billion-for-high-speed-rail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
