Archive for category State

2010 CDP-CYD Convention!!

EBYD is going to Los Angeles!

Get excited!  The California Democratic Party (CDP) and California Young Democrats (CYD) will hold their 2010 State Convention in Los Angeles at LA Live this April!

The state convention is an exciting time where politicians and activists from all over the state and nation come to meet and talk to fellow Democrats and vote on key party issues that affect our state.

When is Convention?

Convention will be held from Friday, April 16 to Sunday, April 18.  Those volunteering with the CDP at Convention are required to attend a mandatory training on the evening of Thursday, April 15.

Where is Convention?

Convention will be held at LA Live, aka the Los Angeles Convention Center Complex in Downtown Los Angeles.

How Do I Sign Up?

For more details on how to join EBYD on our trip to Los Angeles for Convention, please check out our 2010 State Convention page.  Here we will have all the up-to-date information and details on travel costs, transportation to and from Los Angeles, where to stay and Convention agendas.

Questions:

Still have questions about Convention?  Please contact our Convention Organizer, Reuben Duarte, at reuben@ebyd.org for more information.

How Vulnerable are Dems in the Midterms?

A lot of talk is, again, cirulating the political water coolers about the vulnerability of Democrats in the upcoming Midterm elections.  With the recent announcement by Evan Bayh that he will not seek re-election in November, many are asking the big question… Just how vulnerable are Democrats this year?

Chris Matthews from Hardball gives us his big number: 29% of a chance Dems lose control of the Senate:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

 

Politico headlined its website today with a story on five different ways Democrats, for lack of a better phrase, can screw themselves over and lose control of the Senate:

The lesson of the tumultuous past 45 days is that the contours of the political landscape can change in an instant — and a death, a retirement or a top candidate’s decision not to run can wreak havoc on the best laid political plans.

Click Here for full Politico article.  Video Below

 

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Additionally, bringing it a little closer to home, a recent Rassmussen Poll shows the race to re-elect CA Senator, Barbara Boxer, will be a close one:

Boxer leads former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina 46% to 42%, virtually unchanged from January. Another seven percent (7%) would vote for some other candidate, while five percent (5%) are undecided. Boxer led Fiorina by nine points in November and 10 points in September.

The incumbent also holds a four-point lead over former Congressman Tom Campbell, 45% to 41%. Four percent (4%) like another candidate, and 10% are undecided. Boxer held the same lead over Campbell, just after he joined the race in January.

Boxer leads still state Assemblyman Chuck Devore, 47% to 42%. Six percent (6%) prefer some other candidate in that match-up, and five percent (5%) are undecided. In January, Boxer held a 46% to 40% advantage over Devore. In November, she led Devore by 10 points.

California Awarded $2.35 Billion for High Speed Rail!

The White House announced yesterday that California would recieve $2.35 billion for for rail related projects.  Specifically, $2.25 billion for high speed rail construction, wich included $400 million reserved for construction of the SF Transbay Terminal Station, and $1 billion for Amtrak corridor improvements including:

Capitol Corridor-South Terminal Station Improvement
Capitol Corridor-YoloXover (Yolo West Crossover)
Capitol Corridor-Track Relocation
Pacific Surfliner -Railroad Crossover Program
Pacific Surfliner – Oceanside Stub Project 1
Pacific Surfliner Corridor-MOW Spurs
Los Angeles to Fullerton Triple Track
Pacific Surfliner Corridor-PE NEPA Ortega
Pacific Surfliner -Corridor Strategic Assessment
Rolling Stock-Locomotive Emissions Upgrade (including San Joaquins)
Rolling Stock-Cab Car Bicycle Storage

I am a staunch supporter of high speed rail in California, and all over the US for that matter.  I have wanted to see a high speed rail in our state since i was a little kid.  I remember absolutely HATING the fact that my mother, who refused to drive through Tehachapi, would make me and my sister join her in the 5 hour journey to San Bernardino to visit my grandparents (driving in a car vs. public transit is only 4 hours).  The trip was a 1 hour Amtrak train ride from Hanford to Bakersfield, followed by a 4 hour bus ride from Bakersfield to San Bernardino.  I get closterphobic just thinking about it.  This same trip on the proposed CAHSR would take approximately 2 hours from Fresno to Ontario or Riverside stations.

The California High Speed Rail Authority released its business plan in December, detailing things like cost projections.  The plan stated it would cost about $42 billion to create the entire system.  Yes, $2.25 isn’t a lot vis a vis $42 billion, but it definately jumps starts a project and allows the Authority to create a visible and tangible portion of the system to help the hesitators and nay-sayors come over to the greener side.  Keep in mind that $42 billion is less than 1/3 the cost to expand our highways to accomodate the same number of projected future travelers at $150 billion.  Not to mention that whole, environmentally friendly and creating about 450,000 permanent and 500,000 temp jobs in the process and stimulating the economy in a recession, thingy…

Who’s excited?  I’m excited!

I will also give a plug to the grassroots organization working to help bring high speed rail to California: Californian’s for High Speed Rail.  They are a new group but i beleive they represent a great opportunity to bring on the ground momentum and make Californians excited about the idea of high speed rail.

Tags: , ,

Prop 8 Trail Begins Today in SF – Follow Online!

The trial to hear the constitutionality of Proposition 8 in Federal Court begun today in San Francisco.  Unfortunately, the court has blocked recording of the trial to be aired on YouTube.  But you can follow live reporting on Twitter and websites.  Here are just a few reporters:

[Legal Info Note] Today’s trial is NOT before the US Supreme Court (SCOTUS).  Today’s trial is the beginning of the Federal Trial against Prop 8 that, through appeal, could eventually be brought before SCOTUS.  However, SCOTUS did intervene today by saying it would not allow the Federal Court in SF to record the trial for airing on YouTube.

Twitter:

ACLU of Northern California

The Advocate

American Foundation for Equal Rights

Rebecca F

FedCourtJunkie

Non-Twitter

Prop 8 Trial Tracker (Courage Campaign)

Tags: , ,

The Conservative Case for Gay Marriage

Ted Olson (right) and David Boise, normally two attorneys on opposite sides of the courtrooom (who even argued against each other in Gore v. Bush in 2000) have taken up the task of arguing against Prop 8 in US Supreme Court (SCOTUS).  Their move is rather controversial, even among gay rights activists, as some beleive the movement isnt ready to take this issue of gay-marriage to the nations highest court; wanting to wait until more local and state victories before asking SCOTUS to rule.  Nevertheless, this dynamic duo of legal clout is marching forward.

In a recent NEWSWEEK article: The Conservative Case for Gay Marriage, Ted Olson writes why, as a staunch Conservative Republican, he supports legalizing gay-marriage.  It’s three pages long and worth the read.  Here is an excerpt:

Many of my fellow conservatives have an almost knee-jerk hostility toward gay marriage. This does not make sense, because same-sex unions promote the values conservatives prize. Marriage is one of the basic building blocks of our neighborhoods and our nation. At its best, it is a stable bond between two individuals who work to create a loving household and a social and economic partnership. We encourage couples to marry because the commitments they make to one another provide benefits not only to themselves but also to their families and communities. Marriage requires thinking beyond one’s own needs. It transforms two individuals into a union based on shared aspirations, and in doing so establishes a formal investment in the well-being of society. The fact that individuals who happen to be gay want to share in this vital social institution is evidence that conservative ideals enjoy widespread acceptance. Conservatives should celebrate this, rather than lament it.

Legalizing same-sex marriage would also be a recognition of basic American principles, and would represent the culmination of our nation’s commitment to equal rights. It is, some have said, the last major civil-rights milestone yet to be surpassed in our two-century struggle to attain the goals we set for this nation at its formation.

This bedrock American principle of equality is central to the political and legal convictions of Republicans, Democrats, liberals, and conservatives alike. The dream that became America began with the revolutionary concept expressed in the Declaration of Independence in words that are among the most noble and elegant ever written: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

I beleive Ted Olson’s argument is excellent and well thought.  However, i can’t say its an argument that i haven’t already heard from pre-existing gay-marriage advocates.  As an openly gay young man, i find it comforting that these arguments exist in the face of ignorance and discrimination.  But i admit i am still concerned how ready SCOTUS is to hear on the constitutionality of gay-marriage.  SCOTUS is a conservative body by its nature, not necessarily because of who sits on the bench.  The court just doesn’t like to rock the boat, so to speak, on a regular basis.  It is true  SCOTUS has good history with judging on the side of equality, but we must remember that cases like Brown v. Board were decided not on their own but after a slew of smaller cases were faught and won by civil-rights activists.  It wasn’t a “break” from tradition as much as i believe some like to argue it is.  The court had good precedent to rule the way it did.  So we need to ensure that the precedent exists to allow SCOTUS to rule in favor of marriage equality and not be hindered by its own conservative nature.

Read the full NEWSWEEK article here

Tags: , , , ,

Should Dems Be Worried?

Its no secret that i am a big fan of Hardball with Chris Matthews.  Nevertheless, i was catching up on the show from last night when i saw this opening segment on the atmosphere in the Democratic Party following the recent high profile retirements.

I thought about whether or not i should post an opinion blog about what i saw, given that i do have opinions (obviously).  But i decided to leave it as a question to readers. 

Should Democrats be worried going in to 2010 campaign season?  What does this mean for Dems running in California in moderate and conservative areas? Check out these videos: The first one has Chris Matthews talking with Democratic and Republican strategists and the second is a segment called “The Politics Fix”.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Tags: ,